Reason and responsibility: readings in some basic problems of philosophy. by Joel Feinberg; Russ Shafer-Landau;. Print book. English. Sixteenth edition. Joel Feinberg (Professor Emeritus, late of University of Arizona) was widely recognized as one of America's leading political and social philosophers. Acclaimed. Doing & Deserving; Essays in the Theory of aracer.mobi Feinberg - - Princeton: Princeton University Press. Psychological aracer.mobi Feinberg - - In Russ Shafer-Landau & Joel Feinberg (eds.), Reason and Responsibility. Reason and Responsibility: Readings in Some.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Japanese|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Registration needed]|
Reason and Responsibility: Readings in Some. Basic Problems of Philosophy, 12th/13th edition (Belmont, CA: /). 2. Online course packet available at . gmt reason and responsibility feinberg pdf - joel feinberg (october 19, in detroit, michigan reason and responsibility readings in some. philosophy book by cengage learning ebook pdf at our library. get reason and tldr - [pdf]free reason and responsibility readings in some basic problems of.
Moore: Proof of an External World. The Methods of Science. Salmon: An Encounter with David Hume. The Mind-Body Problem. Can Non-Humans Think?
Searle: Minds, Brains, and Programs. Lycan: Robots and Minds. Personal Identity and the Survival of Death. Locke s Account of Our Personal Identity. Chisholm: Human Freedom and the Self.
Modified in this edition 3. Values Values will include behavioural attributes and attitudes i.
Morals The code by which we decide what is right or wrong, good or bad. In this sense, morality has a broader scope whereas values are more likely to often to be referred to on a daily basis for decision making, as with purchasing and consumption decisions.
Whilst both morality and values are learnt socially and culturally, values are more socially particular i. The term ethics refers to the more theoretical discussions of morality, including debates on professional conduct and philosophical development of ethical theories.
Our ethical underpinning, which is often implicit and not obvious to us, will determine our moral code. The following table offers a brief glance of some of the widely accepted predominant ethical theories. Whereas for an individual who follows Aristotelian thinking, development and exercise of the virtues i.
Consequently, through their application to the world of business we can attempt to explain business behaviour i. Suggested reading Book Luetge, Christoph. Article Koehn, Daryl. The task then turns to outlining a contemporary ethical framework known as Care Ethics with consideration given to what light this shines on the process of moral reasoning and decision making in an organisational context.
Academics such as Dow Votaw based in Berkeley, California started to theorize what social responsibility referred to, noting the terms ambiguity. Exactly what the objective, motivation, desired outcome and ethical drivers are behind CSR remains opaque and open to wide ranging interpretation. It should be noted upfront that this is a model designed to specifically engage with social responsibility in the context of for-profit organisations, as is apparent from the economic level be profitable.
This is where CSR differs from the pursuit of profit at all costs; the decision making process is extended to include other responsibilities, which crucially include ethical ones — the reasoning and decision making process becomes explicitly moral in nature.
After the economic, Carroll addresses legal responsibilities, although he does note that the economic and legal coexist. Organisations which operate without employing CSR often use the argument that adherence to the legal system is sufficient because it incorporates legally agreed moral codes of acceptability; that following the legal guidelines is sufficient to follow societies moral code.
This is a weak argument as the view chooses to turn a blind eye to the corporate and organisational lobbying which takes place in order to control and affect the legal system; to consequently manipulate the moral code. It also fails to take into account the sizeable time delay between changes in morals and values and implementation in law.
An example of this would be the current disputes concerning corporate tax legislation and the public outcry against the UK tax contribution of companies such as Amazon, Google and Uber. Consequently, not only has the decision making process been greatly reduced by the availability of legal parameters but the tricky waters of moral reasoning, in terms of what it and what is not ethical or good practice will have already been navigated.
In the earlier section on Ethics, Morals and Values the role that each of these plays in decision making was briefly outlined, along with the important fact that these are socially and culturally variable. These are often difficult issues to grapple with and moral dilemmas can often make people feel most uncomfortable. When we consider all of this within an organisational context constituted by multiple individuals, the complexity becomes manifold.
Readings in Some Basic Problems of Philosophy. Reason and responsibility readings in some basic problems of philosophy.
Home About Help Search. All rights reserved.